top of page




Albert Camus

A plague of


(Globalism and Psyops)

If you've now read through the science of contagion and vaccination, you're probably starting to wonder what on earth's going on. But to understand the true nature of the pandemic we must first gather a political context.


When we think of government, we tend to think of elected politicians, ministers, civil servants etc. We tend to think of 'here today, gone tomorrow' politicians at the helm of disparate, national hierarchies. 


But today, is this really where the power is or does parliament simply now set the stage for an ongoing, olde-worlde pantomime? 'Bread and circuses', an entertaining but entirely distracting chirade. Who have Julian Assange and Ed Snowden been hiding from all this time? Boris Johnson? Donald Trump?

"The less power you have, the more you try to exaggerate it. The more power you have, the more you try to conceal it."


Yuval Noah Harari

"Democracy is a con game, it's a word invented

to placate people into accepting a given institution."

Jacques Fresco

Real power simply lies in the ability to influence and mould human perception. With such powers, news alone can effortlessly amend the thoughts, feelings and subsequent actions of entire populations to align with the will of perceived authority.

“Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.”


George Orwell

Historically, without the bells and whistles of modern, digital communication, manipulating the mass mindset wasn't so easy and war was the only way.


From Julius Caesar to Ghengis Khan, dictators have long sought to control the masses. And in the twentieth century, through Mao, Stalin and Hitler alone, the goal of global domination reigned. The largest empire of all, however, was a little closer to home...


Today, through the United Nations and the rise of modern democracy, we tend to feel this despotic goal has all but vanished.


But through the increasing powers of global banking cartels, multinational corporations and a ruthless US military industrial complex, it’s surely time to question what we’re really united for - world peace or world fascism?

British Empire.jpg

Since the American revolution, the US has been at war for 227 out of 244 years - 93% of its entire lifespan.


Continuing to engage in a number of wars since the formation of the UN, the superpower of the world evidently remains an incredibly hostile nation. 


So how is it possible to get away with such routine warmongery? That's easy, simply state that it's for our protection:

"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor. And when the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar."


The nature of the alleged enemy is entirely irrelevant. It could be an 'evil foreign force' with weapons of mass destruction or an entirely hypothetical, invisible but 'deadly' pathogen. So long as fear is induced upon the population and a false premise for protection is built, people will acquiesce, even enthusiastically support the imposed draconian measures.


This psychological manipulation is frequently used and well documented: 

"Naturally, the common people don't want war, but after all, it's the leaders of a country that determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country."

Hermann Goering, Hitler's Reich-Marshall 

at the Nuremberg Trials

Known as a 'Hegelian dialectic', this covert technique works simply by falsely fabricating threats to incite the inevitable response that 'something must be done'.


Widespread approval is now granted for the controversial solution and agenda planned from the outset. Problem, reaction, solution.

"Those who 

surrender liberty for safety, will soon lose both."

Benjamin Franklin 

Let's now take a quick look at some examples of this in recent history. We'll briefly identify the mindset that drives it and learn about the declassified, criminal track record of big pharma, government and the U.S. military industrial complex.

Shortly after the second world war, the U.S. willingly recruited and granted passports for 1,600 top ranking Nazis in what was known as operation paperclip.

Many emigrated to parts of South America and, of course, the US itself. One of them was Wernher Von Braun - a nazi aerospace engineer - who quickly became a director at NASA.

Although we physically defeated fascism at this time, the US government openly allowed fascist ideology to persist in powerful ranks within the military industrial complex. 

"The bigger the lie, the more they'll believe it."

Joseph Goebells - Reich minister of propaganda

The Iraq War was a good example. A war solely initiated on evidence, we were told, that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Only years later did we discover this was never true.


Today, the west controls Iraq and the fear of terrorism is forever used to justify the expansion of surveillance and control. How many people needlessly died as a direct result of this cold and calculated deception?


In 1962 the US Department of Defence planned false flag acts of terrorism against the US in an attempt to oust Castro and justify the invasion of Cuba. Operation Northwoods, as it's known, was rejected by JFK who - through his ambition to expose the corruption - didn't have long to live.


Declassified document here


"The best way to control the opposition

is to lead it ourselves."

Vladimir Lenin

Operation Mockingbird was a secret campaign by the CIA to influence media.


Begun in the 1950s, it was initially organised by Cord Meyer and Allen W. Dulles and later led by Frank Wisner.


The organisation recruited leading American journalists to help present the CIA’s views, and funded student, cultural organisations, and magazines as fronts.


As it developed, it also worked to influence foreign media and political campaigns, in addition to activities by other operating units of the CIA.


Declassified document here.

"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

William Casey (CIA director 1981-87)

"Give me the media and I'll make

a herd of pigs out of any nation."

Joseph Goebells


On August 4, 1964 the US DoD claimed to have been attacked by North Vietnamese torpedo boats. This justified the Gulf of Tonkin resolution which granted US president Lyndon Johnson the authority to assist South East Asian countries. 


It later transpired that 'Tonkin Ghosts' (false radar images) were used for direct engagement in the Vietnamese war -  brutalising and killing thousands of innocent Vietnamese civilians. 


For 40 years the US CDC experimented on hundreds of African Americans in Tuskegee University, Alabama. The Tuskeegee experiments studied the effects of untreated syphilis without informing the community of penicillin - a known cure.


The Bologna massacre in 1980 saw British para-military, and CIA 'stay-behind' troops bomb a train station and blame it on leftist groups in what's known as Operation Gladio.

"It's easy to fool the people, but very hard

to convince them they've been fooled."

Mark Twain

These events are now declassified, factual and self-evident. Others, however, remain classified and are yet to be commonly accepted. Please follow the links to learn more, this is just a general overview to raise awareness of corrupt activity.


It's important to ask yourself what sort of government would permit such crimes? One that pleads for you to 'stay home, save lives?' The Fabian society symbol of a wolf in sheep's clothing springs to mind...


Through the increasing centralist powers of the UN and the EU, are we not heading towards a one world government? - a 21st century Soviet Union of sorts.


A new world order (Latin: Novus Ordo Seclorum - as seen on the reverse seal of the US dollar bill) and collectivised but capitalist world of automatons, endlessly enslaved for survival.

"The individual is

handicapped in coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."


J. Edgar Hoover


Union, togetherness, a world without borders, this sounds great, but what's the model? Who's behind it?

"Forward movement is not helpful if what is needed is a change of direction"

David Fleming

This much we can begin to discover at the Rockefeller Foundation and Global Business Network. In 2010 they published a document called 'Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development'.


On page 18 they outline the first of four scenarios for the future. It's called Lock Step and it explores how the most authoritarian governments respond best in a new world following a pandemic. The introduction describes what Lock Step is:

"A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback."

The scenario goes on to explore the ways in which the most authoritarian governments force citizens to wear masks, take the temperatures of individuals at the entry points of public places, and enforce strict, mandatory quarantine. Sound familiar?


The document goes on to say that in this new world "Philanthropic organisations interested in promoting universal rights and freedoms will get blocked at many nations' borders."

'Governments love pandemics for the same reason they love war. It gives them the ability to impose controls on a population they'd otherwise never accept - creating laws for orchestrating and imposing obedience.'


Robert F. Kennedy

More to come! (Under Construction)

Further Reading...

With the science and social context we've covered, you may now find it easier to accept the true nature of current affairs.


On the next page we'll explore the alleged pandemic itself and learn how, yet again, the Hegelian dialectic has been employed.

Towards the Truth...

Learn the true nature of current affairs and what we can do about it...

bottom of page